Every November 22 we commemorate
the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy. That date is engrained in U.S. history and
many people who were alive then recall vividly where they were when the news
from Dallas broke. We remember that
dreadful date but hardly anyone realizes that JFK’s birthday was May 29.
Also heartbreaking was the
assassination of civil rights icon Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., which occurred
in Memphis on April 4, 1968. Yet the
date with which he is most associated is his birthday, January 15. A national holiday was established on the
third Monday of each January near that date to honor the fallen civil rights
hero.
We recently passed the 46th
anniversary of Dr. King’s death. I chose
April 4—the other MLK day—to reflect upon Dr. King’s contributions and what
might have been had his young life not been cut short by an assassin’s bullet. On
that horrific day, the civil rights movement following Dr. King’s doctrine of
nonviolence experienced a stunning blow.
Whereas the U.S. Constitution
provides continuity and stability when a president cannot complete his term,
that is not the case when a larger-than-life, charismatic but unelected leader
is struck down. To be clear, other civil
rights leaders have attempted to fill Dr. King’s shoes and worked extremely
hard in an effort to end legalized segregation and discrimination and attain
justice for African-Americans. Rep. John Lewis from the MLK era, as an example,
continues the fight even today. However,
there has been nobody I know who has been compared to Dr. King or is perceived
to be his equal. Many have succeeded
him; nobody replaced him.
Arguably the one white leader
who had been revered by blacks during the 1960s was Robert F. Kennedy, the
younger brother of the assassinated president.
He, too, would be slain two months later. Kennedy, a senator at the time and running
for president during the 1968 primary campaign, disclosed the assassination of
MLK that evening in what many have hailed as the “greatest speech ever” at a scheduled
stop in Indianapolis. News didn’t travel
as fast in those days—unlike the instantaneous transmission of news and photos
today—and the crowd groaned and wept at the announcement of the killing that
occurred hours earlier.
Kennedy implored love and
compassion and decried hatred knowing that the audience would be filled with
anger especially since the accused assassin was a white man. It was to no avail.
Though Indianapolis remained
calm, riots broke out in over 100 cities, including Baltimore, reflecting the
anger of a populace who lost their spiritual, if not political, leader. A few years earlier, such riots took place in
Detroit, Harlem and Watts, but they were a result, for the most part, of police
actions that were hostile to inner city blacks.
This time the boiling point was
reached with the murder of MLK as a substantial segment of Americans saw a
hopeless future and acted out accordingly.
Emotions were already ramped up because of the divisive war in Vietnam,
which reached its peak in 1968.
Unfortunately, the riots produced a white backlash, spawning a “law and
order” dogma by conservatives, which impeded progress.
Nonetheless, there have been
substantial gains in the quest for civil rights since the day we lost MLK. Even before then, largely because of the
efforts of Dr. King, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act
into law in 1964, and we have recently commemorated the 50th
anniversary of this landmark legislation.
But just as the elimination of
homophobia has been a slow slog through history, so has the efforts to end
racism. Income inequality persists for
African-Americans as does a sizable achievement and employment gap. Schools in black areas are sub-standard and
poorly funded. Many families continue to
be torn apart because of poverty, drugs, a lack of health care and other
influences. Crime remains a problem in
most of the country’s inner cities.
Hope emerged, however, with the
election of Barack Obama as president. Some
saw this as the end of racism as the election of the first African-American to
the White House was an unimaginable achievement. People celebrated and imagined how Martin
Luther King, Jr. would have reacted to this historic milestone. But the
temptation to see this as a new beginning was tempered by the fact that it
brought back the old demons of racism and another backlash.
Ugly racist signs, t-shirts and
epithets were common during the 2008 campaign.
Efforts to block President Obama on his legislative initiatives are
believed to be, in part, race motivated.
The Affordable Care Act or Obamacare was opposed by those who saw this
as a way to increase premiums on white people so that blacks can get health
insurance. Even the attempt to allow the
country to default on its debts was inspired by hatred towards the president to
make him look bad. And then there was
the Trayvon Martin fiasco, which ignited more racist commentary in what we call
the “new media.” Add to that the voter suppression efforts. It goes on and on.
Instead of moving forward, we
have taken a step back. Dr. King would
not be smiling on us now despite the election of President Obama. Instead, he would be shedding a tear—maybe a
lot of tears.
In recalling MLK’s murder on
that muggy April 4 afternoon at the Lorraine Motel, it’s important to note how
progress can be thwarted so easily and how fragile racial equality is. We should consider April 4 as another Martin
Luther King Day, even unofficially, to reflect upon what could have been and
how far we still need to go.
Following renovations, the
National Civil Rights Museum at the Lorraine Motel re-opened on April 5 to
remind everybody of the blood, sweat and tears shed during this movement and
that the struggle is far from over. As Dr. King said, “No one really knows why they are alive until they know what they’d die for.”
No comments:
Post a Comment