Courtesy of slate.com |
The recent election for DNC
Chair exposed a continued divide between establishment Democrats and
progressives. In an attempt to bring the
factions together, Mr. Perez asked Rep. Ellison to be his deputy. However, such a chasm, should it remain, will
do little to alter the Democrats’ minority power in most state governments and
the federal branches. #hocopolitics
Rallying against President Trump
could be cathartic if not unifying. Would that alone be sufficient to win back
the Senate, or House, or some of the governors’ mansions in 2017 or 2018? The answer is no.
Aside from enunciating a
rationale to unseat Republicans based on policy and connecting better with
voters overall, the Democrats need to set aside their habitual in-fighting, get
fired up emotionally, and increase voter turnout—something they historically have
not done too well—in off-year elections.
A catalyst for that to take
place could lie in the actions taken by former President Barack Obama who
remains the de facto leader of the
Democratic Party and still commands enormous popularity.
President Trump handed the
Democrats a gift last Saturday when he launched a tweet storm charging without
evidence that as president, Barack Obama had the phones tapped at Trump Tower
prior to the election. One tweet wasn’t
enough; four were fired off saying essentially the same thing.
Mr. Trump was said to have
enjoyed how the media were consumed by these tweets rather than focusing on the
increasingly sobering connections between Trump and his people have had with
Russian officials. Days later, Trump did
not back down from the phone tapping charges and his aides have struggled to
answer the barrage of demands for proof of these allegations.
Assuming the charges are not
supportable by facts, it is quite possible that President Obama has been
defamed. Stating without equivocation
that the former president engaged in a felonious act could cause damage to Mr.
Obama’s reputation and degrade his ability to secure a financially beneficial
post-president career.
What Mr. Obama should do is sue
Mr. Trump for libel and force the current president to back up the charges with
proof. Mr. Trump brags about the many
lawsuits he has engaged in though they have largely not been successful. He threatens everybody who gets in his way
with a lawsuit (recall the women during the campaign who accused him of sexual
assault).
“[Trump is] basically stating that Mr. Obama
committed crimes, and to state that somebody has committed a crime when it’s
false is clearly defamatory,” said Benjamin Zipursky, who teaches defamation
law at Fordham University Law School in New York.
“The question is: Is there
enough evidence of serious reckless disregard to send that case to a jury?”
Zipursky added. “I don't know what a court would decide on that, but there is
some evidence of recklessness.”
A lawsuit for say, $50 million, could
and should serve notice to the self-proclaimed billionaire that the amount of
lies that Mr. Trump delivers with mind-boggling regularity would have
consequences.
It would be a steep climb on
several fronts. Presidents are generally
shielded from private lawsuits, but Mr. Trump’s tweet storm can be argued it
was not part of the president’s official duties.
Moreover, Mr. Obama has shown that he doesn’t have a combative temperament to launch such legal action nor would he be inclined to add more division to an already divided country.
Moreover, Mr. Obama has shown that he doesn’t have a combative temperament to launch such legal action nor would he be inclined to add more division to an already divided country.
That said, there have been
reports that Mr. Obama was livid after learning of the tweets. Keep in mind that despite the fact Mr. Trump
accused Mr. Obama of not being a U.S. citizen and, therefore, disqualified from
being president and calling him weak and incompetent during the recent
campaign, Mr. Obama bent over backwards to help smooth the transition to the
new administration. This expression of
gratitude from Mr. Trump in the form of wild, baseless accusations could be
enough to piss him off to at least consider a lawsuit.
And think how Democrats would raucously
cheer the former president on in such a quest.
It might even unite the Party.
No comments:
Post a Comment