Free speech is what all of us cherish, but it’s a
newspaper’s responsibility to ensure that even letters to the editor should be
vetted for factual accuracy and should not allow opinions to be represented as
facts. Julian Bauer’s letter,
(“Restricting religious opinions to churches limits free speech,” May 31) was
long on religious dogma but short on facts.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2344d/2344dd6cf19685cb318ea7957d34e502d740a53a" alt=""
Yes, we hear all the time how marriage is intended for
procreation; never mind it was once a business arrangement by the couples’
families until relatively recently. I
take it that those couples or cannot or do not want procreate should have their
marriage licenses invalidated?
One particular comment merits scrutiny: “Religious people
who practice their faith are, with some exceptions, happier, wealthier and have
more stable families than the general public.”
In response I can offer real facts.
Of the 9 states with the highest percentage white evangelicals (source:beliefnet.com), 7 have the highest poverty rate (source: U.S. Census).
The inconvenience of facts.
Steve Charing
Clarksville
No comments:
Post a Comment