Current County Executive Allan Kittleman and new County Executive Calvin Ball Photo: Baltimore Post Examiner |
On
a chilly Election Day evening, hundreds of Howard County Democratic partisans packed
Kahler Hall in Columbia, Md. to do what folks had hoped to do: celebrate
victories. National and local returns were projected on screens via cable news
programming and a laptop while people huddled around the screens, sat at round
tables engaged in high-spirited political conversations, hitting the buffet
line, mingling about, or taking selfies as polls were closing in much of the
East. #hocopolitics
The
traditional venue for such occasions has been a horror show for Democrats in
2014 and 2016. This night would be
different, many of the Dem supporters hoped and believed. And they were right.
When
the Howard County numbers eventually rolled in with only a handful of precincts
remaining on this November 6 night, several deafening roars exploded as it appeared that Dr. Calvin
Ball, a three-term member of the County Council, was poised to upset incumbent
Allan H. Kittleman as County Executive. Prosecutor Rich Gibson followed with a
lusty defeat of Republican Kim Oldham as the new State’s Attorney, and most of
the other offices down the ballot followed suit. The much ballyhooed Blue Wave was indeed
washing throughout Howard County.
Click here for all the election results in Maryland.
The
biggest loser in these local elections was conventional wisdom, which took a
back seat to other dynamics that were in play. Below are examples of how
conventional wisdom was shattered:
The top of ticket pulls
up lower candidates. Governor Larry Hogan
handily defeated his Democratic challenger Ben Jealous by a 56% to 43%
margin. Gov. Hogan, the odds-on favorite
and a leader in just about every poll, was supposed to help Republican
candidates down the ballot.
It
did not work in Howard County. Mr. Hogan garnered 56.7% to Mr. Jealous’ 42.2%
(similar to the overall state vote) yet the Democrat Dr. Ball defeated the
Republican Mr. Kittleman 52.4% to 47.5%, and most other Dems in the county won
as well.
Results
were similar in other central Maryland counties. In Baltimore County, Gov.
Hogan handily defeated Mr. Jealous by a 61.7% - 37.3% count in that
jurisdiction, but the Democrat John Olszewski, Jr. defeated Republican Al
Redmer, Jr. by a 57.5% to 42.4% margin.
In Anne Arundel, the divergence was even greater. While Gov. Hogan walloped Mr. Jealous 69.1% to
29.8%, Democrat Steuart Pittman outlasted Republican Steve Schuh 52% to 47.9%.
In
all three jurisdictions, incumbent County Executive Republicans succumbed to
Democratic challengers despite the Governor’s margin of victory. Clearly, there were no coattails.
Howard Co.
|
Howard Co.
|
State
|
Kittleman
47.5
|
Hogan
56.7
|
56.1
|
Ball 52.4
|
Jealous 42.2
|
42.8
|
Baltimore Co.
|
Baltimore Co.
|
State
|
Redmer 42.4
|
Hogan
61.7
|
56.1
|
Olszewski 57.5
|
Jealous 37.3
|
42.8
|
Anne Arundel
|
Anne Arundel
|
State
|
Schuh
47.9
|
Hogan
69.1
|
56.1
|
Pittman 52.0
|
Jealous
29.8
|
42.8
|
A favored candidate
shouldn’t start off campaign attacking opponent. One of the criticisms of frontrunner Anthony
Brown’s ill-fated 2014 gubernatorial bid was that he began his campaign by
immediately hitting the relatively unknown Larry Hogan with negative ads thus
elevating his profile. Shrugging off that philosophy, in 2018, the Republican
Governors Association launched vicious attack ads against Mr. Jealous painting
him as “too extreme for Maryland” and one who is guaranteed to raise taxes to
fund his programs. Mr. Jealous was slow to respond and never recovered.
It
should be noted that although Mr. Kittleman had been favored to be re-elected
in Howard County, he did not engage in negative attack ads, and Dr. Ball did
not either, resulting in an unusual but refreshing contest.
Endorsements help
candidates. Republican candidates
throughout the state, sensing an easy victory for Gov. Hogan, did not hesitate
to include “Hogan Endorsed” as part of their materials, advertising and
signage. By and large, it did not work.
Endorsements are overrated and popularity is not transferable when
other more important factors are in play.
Incumbency has an
advantage. The benefits of incumbency are clear. The
candidate has name recognition. He or she probably has a residual war chest
from the previous campaign to spend in the current campaign, which takes some
pressure off of fundraising. The candidate has a record of accomplishments to
run on. And the higher level of visibility based on the time in office serves
as an additional advantage.
In
Howard County, however, Republican incumbents except those whose districts
spilled into more conservative terrain in Carroll County lost. Nonetheless, all
Howard County Democratic incumbents won.
Calvin Ball was not predicted
to win. Mr. Kittleman had all the benefits of
incumbency (see above) and money plus he enjoyed relatively high job approval
and personal popularity. Moreover, a Mason Dixon poll released merely six weeks before the election indicated Mr. Kittleman should
glide to victory as he enjoyed a 16% lead. For Dr. Ball’s part, an internal
poll had forecast a much tighter race.
Dr.
Ball benefitted from his own positive personal attributes, a strong ground game
and solid messaging including his vision for the county that hit the target
especially in the weeks leading up to the election. However, the “Trump effect”
played a significant role, not only in the County Executive race but also with others
down ballot.
Governor
Hogan enjoyed high job approval across the board and pulled in a good chunk
Democratic and independent votes. But after that, Democrats were driven to turn
out to vote Democratic in part, as a protest to Trumpism and the Republican
Party that has enabled it.
Mr.
Kittleman, hardly a Trumpster, was caught between a rock and a hard place. With
less than a third of the county’s active voters identifying as Republican, Mr.
Kittleman needed to pull in Democratic and independent support. His conundrum
was that if he railed against President Trump, he would alienate those GOP
voters who are ardent Trump supporters.
If he was to be silent concerning the president (he largely was), then
Democrats could not see him as a viable antidote to Trump’s policies and
bigotry.
In
addition, Republican activists charged Mr. Kittleman with trying too hard to
get Democrats on board and not paying enough attention to Republican concerns.
Other
factors hurt the incumbent as well including the controversial mulch
legislation, his opposition to Howard being a sanctuary county and the
rebuilding plans following the second Ellicott City flood in three years.
The
intensity of enthusiasm benefitted Dr. Ball; the lack of same hurt Mr.
Kittleman. The lopsided early voting margin for Democrats conveyed excitement
and proved too steep of a hill for Mr. Kittleman to climb. Hoping to eradicate
the Dem lead, Mr. Kittleman only managed 142 more votes than Dr. Ball on
Election Day.
The County Executive race ended with sportsmanship and civility. |
The defeated candidate
does not concede in person.
Finally, as the crowd at Kahler Hall continued
to cheer, hug and high-five one another, news swept among the masses remaining in
the ballroom that Calvin Ball’s opponent, Allan Kittleman, was in the lobby to
personally concede the election and congratulate the victor. In a stunning and
classy move, Mr. Kittleman, his wife and three children, clad in their campaign
yellow t-shirts, entered the building with the candidates embracing and raising
their locked arms as if they both won.
They
did. But conventional wisdom lost.
1 comment:
Very well written Steve. I was able to tell Allan in person on last Monday that his concession was one of the classiest things I had ever seen. I only wish that it were seen nationally. Looking forward to the new Ball administration!!
Post a Comment