Featured Post

Four Decades Along the Rainbow Road

Showing posts with label Maxine Waters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Maxine Waters. Show all posts

Thursday, April 22, 2021

Please Leave a Message

 

Thank Goodness for Barack Obama’s “Hope and Change” slogan in 2008! Other than that, I cannot think of a consistent, punchy, winning message over the past few decades that Democrats came up with. Even Joe Biden’s “Restore the Soul of America” message was poetic, but I doubt it had any impact on the 2020 race.

To be clear, effective messaging doesn’t need to be limited to a slogan or bumper sticker.  But it seems that every time a slogan or a comment is put forth by a Democrat, Republicans pounce on it.

Look how “Defund the Police,” “Medicare for All,” and ‘Green New Deal” were used as weapons against congressional Democratic candidates in 2020. Data are inconclusive as to the impact they had on those races but anecdotally, some politicians claim they had an effect.

Look how the George Floyd murder protests, which were mostly peaceful, were allowed to be manipulated by Republicans to shift the message from needed police reform to the destruction of buildings and even cities. It was a classic case of “Whataboutism.”

The most recent example is Rep. Maxine Waters’ comments regarding the Derek Chauvin trial and what should happen (confrontation) if the verdict is not favorable. The GQP took it and ran with it, and a censure action by Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy had been organized though tabled.

Did the Democrats attempt to censure Marjorie Taylor Greene for her heinous comments or those Republican congressmen who have perpetuated Trump’s big lie on the 2020 election outcome? No. Or even those congressmen who spoke at Trump’s rally that incited the insurrection on January 6? Crickets.

It wasn’t that long ago when Republicans bludgeoned the Democrats for being soft on terrorism. In fact, the 2004 election cycle featured that mantra.  Is it asking a lot for Democrats to turn the tables on Republicans during the 2022 cycle by pointing out THEIR softness on domestic terrorism and white nationalism?

Even the establishment of a 9/11-style commission to look into the events surrounding January 6 can’t get any traction. Why aren’t Democrats beating the Republicans over the head with January 6? Yet, the Republicans Benghazi-ed the Democrats to death when they saw an opportunity.

We cannot ever forget what happened January 6, and we should not allow the Republicans to escape the linkage between the atrocities of that event, Donald Trump and those Republicans who voted to acquit the former president in the impeachment trial when he so clearly incited the attack.

The Democrats do not need a catchy slogan to inculcate this matter into the conversation during the 2022 cycle. Footage will do just nicely. Those horrific images of Trump flag-carrying thugs breaching our Capitol should be a staple in every Democratic ad against those Republicans who are apparently soft on insurrections. Pictures do speak louder than words.


Thursday, October 25, 2018

The Inciter-in-Chief

Thankfully, no blood was spilled as a result of the packages containing explosive devices sent to prominent Democrats and a major news organization less than two weeks before the midterms. But make no mistake; there is blood all over President Trump’s hands even if none was actually spilled (yet).

These packages were sent or delivered to billionaire and Democratic funder George Soros, former Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, former Secretary of State and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, Former Attorney General Eric Holder, Rep. Maxine Waters, former CIA Director John Brennan, former Vice President Joe Biden, Sen. Kamala Harris, Robert DiNiro, Tom Steyer and CNN headquarters. .

What they all have in common is that these people and CNN have been critics of President Trump and have been constant punching bags during his highly charged, incendiary political rallies. He has ranted against those pipe bomb recipients at virtually every rally or meeting with the media.  

Trump asserts that if Democrats are elected (and he calls them “evil”) there would be angry mobs.  The crowd of migrant workers meandering its way towards the U.S. border consists of Middle Easterners, rapists, gangsters and other criminals, says he without a shred of evidence, and they will take over the homes of American citizens. And a familiar refrain from Trump is that the "fake news media" are the enemy of the people.  In essence, he works his supporters into a rabid-like frenzy and they buy into his lies and conspiracy theories—tactics that helped get him elected in the first place.

With these bombs that fortunately did not detonate, Trump may not have direct responsibility. But he has clearly dialed up the temperature in a bitterly divided county and incited some unhinged individual or group to take his rhetoric to heart and act upon it. It was just a matter of time.

As activist Ryan Knight tweeted:




Following the reports by the very media he hates, Trump made a statement at the White House on October 24, which if there was an award for the least convincing, least enthusiastic statement in modern presidential history, he would be carting off a large trophy. The second place finisher was his speech after the Charlottesville tragedy.

Accused bomb maker Cesar Sayok's pro-Trump van
 “I just want to tell you that in these times, we have to unify,” Trump said going through the motions. “We have to come together and send one very clear, strong, unmistakable message that acts or threats of political violence of any kind have no place in the United States of America.”

This prompted another tweeter to note:



Unify…hmm.   Maybe he should play back his speeches at his rallies to see how much he has attempted to unify. Since his inauguration in front of a sparse crowd, he has shown he is president of only his base and not the entire country. I wrote about this point in August 2017 following the Charlottesville debacle.

Trump’s hollow plea for unity is a desperate and insincere attempt to distract from the blame most of the country has assigned to his divisive rhetoric as a contributor towards this domestic terrorism. It came at an inopportune time for Trump just prior to the midterms as the future of his presidency will be largely influenced by the outcome.  He has no one to blame but himself for a change.